Hindsight Bias

Introduction

After an event has occurred, people often look back and convince themselves that the outcome was obvious and likely, and that they could have predicted it. This is known as ‘hindsight bias’, or the ‘knew-it-all-along’ effect. In actual fact – particularly in the investment world – outcomes can rarely be reasonably predicted ahead of time.

Hindsight bias is common and can be attributed to our natural need to find order in the world. We create explanations that allow us to make sense of our surroundings, and that help us to believe that events are predictable.

The human ability to find patterns and to link cause and effect can be useful – for example, to a scientist carrying out experiments. However, finding false links between an event and its outcome can sometimes result in unreliable over-simplification.

Studies[1] have also shown that hindsight bias occurs because it’s easier for people to understand and remember the actual outcome than it is to consider the many other possible outcomes that, in the end, didn’t come to pass.

Given how important investment decisions are in our everyday lives, hindsight bias is frequently observed among investors.

 

Impact on investment decisions

One of the most significant effects of hindsight bias is the way in which it can influence investment decisions.

It does this by encouraging investors to over-estimate the accuracy of their past forecasts. This leads to a false sense of security, causing investors to assume that their future forecasts and decisions will be equally accurate.

As a result, investors often make decisions based on future investment outcomes which may seem obvious and highly likely to them, but actually involve much more uncertainty and risk than they realise.

Philip E. Tetlock, a professor of management at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, has studied people’s tendency to exhibit hindsight bias. “Even after it has been explained to you 100 times, you can still fall prey to the bias” he has said. “Indeed, even after you’ve written about it 100 times.”

The ability of investors to identify a bubble after it has burst is a classic case of hindsight bias. In both 1999 and 2007, for example, very few investors correctly forecasted that stock markets were about to fall. However, when we now look back at those times, it’s often felt that the signs of what would happen next were clear and there for all to see.

 

Case study

Hindsight bias can be illustrated by the following case study and chart. In this example, our investor Stuart invests in two stocks during 2013.

In January, after much research, Stuart decides to invest in Company A. The share price soon increases substantially in value. Stuart is delighted – his research has paid off! He congratulates himself on his perception and investment insight.

In December, Stuart decides to invest again. His success with Company A gives him confidence that he will be able to pick another winning stock. This time, Stuart invests in Company B.

Of course nobody can be certain how Company B’s shares will perform, including Stuart. But he is more confident in his expected (positive) outcome for Company B – and less focused on the wide range of other possible investment outcomes for its share price – than he might have been before his success with Company A.

In short, hindsight bias has led Stuart to become over-confident in his stock-picking skills.

graph(1)

Illustrative purposes only.

 

Eliminating hindsight bias

The first rule of avoiding the common investment pitfalls associated with hindsight bias is to be aware that it exists.

Even experienced investors can never be certain how particular investments will perform in the future. Investors must always balance risk and return, placing equal emphasis on all factors that have impacted previous investment decisions, both successful and unsuccessful.

Doing so will provide investors with a clearer and more balanced perspective to their decision-making process. Maintaining this focus can enable investors to avoid the unfounded over-confidence in their predictive abilities that hindsight bias can trigger.

An alternative approach would be to invest in a managed fund, run by a professional investment manager. Investment managers tend to follow consistent, repeatable investment processes which can help eliminate hindsight bias from investment decisions.%


The Power of Compounding

Compounding isn’t a new concept – many of us will remember studying it back in our school days. Legendary scientist Albert Einstein famously called it ‘the most powerful force in the universe’, while American business magnate John D Rockefeller suggested compounding is the ‘eighth wonder of the world’.

These might sound like bold claims, but the power of compounding on an investment portfolio should certainly not be underestimated.

What is compounding?

In simple terms, compounding is the process whereby returns made on an investment are reinvested in order to generate subsequent returns of their own.

The concept of compounding is best illustrated using an example. Twins Annie and Vanessa both allocated $10,000 to the same interest-bearing investment on their 25th birthday. For simplicity, let’s assume the investment pays interest of 5% per year.

Annie reinvests all of her interest every year, while Vanessa banks the $500 each year and spends it on everyday living expenses. Let’s see how their investments had fared by their 45th birthdays.

Figure 1: Effect of compounding over 20 years

  Annie’s investment value ($) 5% compound interest ($) Vanessa’s investment value ($) 5% interest ($)
10,000 10,000
Year 1 10,500 500 10,000 500
Year 2 11,025 525 10,000 500
Year 3 11,576 551 10,000 500
Year 4 12,155 579 10,000 500
Year 5 12,763 608 10,000 500
Year 6 13,401 638 10,000 500
Year 7 14,071 670 10,000 500
Year 8 14,775 704 10,000 500
Year 9 15,513 739 10,000 500
Year 10 16,289 776 10,000 500
Year 11 17,103 814 10,000 500
Year 12 17,959 855 10,000 500
Year 13 18,856 898 10,000 500
Year 14 19,799 943 10,000 500
Year 15 20,789 990 10,000 500
Year 16 21,829 1,039 10,000 500
Year 17 22,920 1,091 10,000 500
Year 18 24,066 1,146 10,000 500
Year 19 25,270 1,203 10,000 500
Year 20 26,533 1,263 10,000 500
Total value received 26,533 20,000

Source: CFSGAM. Figures used for illustrative purposes only.

Vanessa earned $500 interest each and every year for the 20 year period – a total of $10,000. Of course she still had her original $10,000 investment as well.

Annie, on the other hand, saw her investment grow to more than $26,000 by reinvesting her interest. The additional $6,000 she earned over and above Vanessa highlights the power of compounding. You can see from the table that Annie’s investment is now earning her $1,263 per year, while Vanessa’s investment is still earning her only $500. This differential would continue to grow over time if the sisters remained invested.

Make compounding work even harder for you

The power of compounding can be magnified if you make small regular contributions to your investment. Let’s look at another example to highlight the concept.

Brothers Jim, Dan and Tom all decided to invest $10,000 in the same managed fund for 10 years. Over that time the fund returned an average of 8% pa.

Happy with his original investment decision, Jim did not make any additional contributions. Dan, the wiser brother,understood the effects of compounding and made additional regular savings of $100 per month. Tom – the wisest of them all – worked out he could afford to save an extra $200 per month and made sure he always contributed that amount to his investment. The difference in their investment returns over 10 years is startling:

Figure 3: Effect of compounding with regular contributions over 10 years

  Initial     investment Monthly contribution Annual return Value after 10 years
Jim $10,000 0 8% pa $21,589
Dan $10,000 $100 8% pa $39,602
Tom $10,000 $200 8% pa $57,614

Source: CFSGAM. Figures used for illustrative purposes only.

Of course the example is a stylised one. It ignores potential fluctuations in investment returns over the period, which would affect the three outcomes in reality.

These examples highlight how compounding and contributing regularly to an investment can have a major influence on investment performance. The long-term performance impact of compounding can be significant and must not be overlooked by investors. This is also the main reason why it pays to engage with your super early and start making additional contributions so compounding can work it’s magic.  Perhaps Einstein and Rockefeller were right, after all.


Herd behaviour

Herd behaviour is driven by emotional rather than rational behaviour. Often little attention is paid to investment fundamentals as investors focus on what other people are reacting to in the market.

All investors are prone to behaviours and emotions that can lead to poor investment decisions. One of the most common pitfalls is known as ‘herd behaviour’. This describes large numbers of individuals acting in the same way at the same time, typically by buying into rising markets and selling out of falling markets. This behaviour can cause markets to dramatically rise and fall in value – known as ‘bubbles’.

Bubbles can only be identified with hindsight, after a rapid and marked drop in value has occurred. These sudden drops are sometimes referred to as ‘crashes’ or ‘bubble bursts’. Because bubbles are only identified in retrospect, many investors often get caught out by the sudden and rapid decline in the value of their investment.

Herd behaviour is driven by emotional rather than rational behaviour. These emotions are typically optimism and greed when markets are rising, and fear and panic when markets are falling. Little attention is paid to the investment fundamentals, which means herd behaviour rarely leads to successful investment outcomes.

There are two main drivers of herd behaviour when it comes to investing. Firstly, people don’t want to miss out on making a profit. Secondly, we assume that when a large number of people are buying into the same investment, they can’t all be wrong. This means that there is often little understanding of the underlying investment, and more attention is focused on what other people are doing. Consequently, it is often the less experienced investor who gets caught up in herd behaviour.

Bubble indicators – what to watch out for

  • Strong, sustained rallies and stretched valuations
  • Hearing ‘this time it’s different’
  • A flurry of initial public offerings, mergers and acquisitions
  • Investor greed and a fear of missing out
  • Everything moving together, regardless of quality
  • Media headlines talking up the latest investment trend

Case study

It’s October 1999 and Ken has been keeping an eye on the sharemarket. Everyone is talking about the exciting future of technology companies and he has noticed most of them have doubled in value during the past 12 months. He doesn’t know much about investing or technology companies, but assumes all the other investors know something that he doesn’t. Without really understanding why the stocks are rising, he invests $10,000 in a technology-based index fund, reassured that many other investors are doing the same. Four months later he is delighted that the value of his investment has risen more than 50%. All those people were right after all.

Then, in February 2000, his investment starts losing value and Ken can’t see any reason behind the fall. All of a sudden everyone is rushing to sell their technology stocks and no one is buying any; the exact opposite of just a few weeks earlier. The drop in value is so abrupt that by the time Ken reacts and sells his holdings he has lost most of his original investment.

Like many others who had jumped on the ‘dot.com’ bandwagon, Ken did not do his research and invested without fully understanding the sector or risks. He thought to himself “this time it’s different”. Looking back he acknowledges that the signs of a bubble were there for all to see.

One way to avoid such a pitfall is to invest in a well diversified investment portfolio with a disciplined investment process which is designed to meet long-term investment goals, rather than be concerned with following the latest trend.

Exhibit 1: Value of $10,000 invested in the technology-based NASDAQ stock market (three years to 31 August 2001)

095da9c

Source: Bloomberg. Chart is used for illustrative purposes only.

While it’s tempting to follow the latest investment trend, it is imperative to always fully understand an investment before making an investment decision.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about herd behaviour.

“Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy” – Warren Buffet


Ethical Investing

Ethical investing involves much more than most people realize.  It can offer numerous opportunities and benefits for individual investors and those preparing for retirement.

So then, what does it mean to invest ethically?

The basics investment process

In order to truly understand your equity portfolio and make the correct selections, it’s important to comprehend the drivers behind the businesses you’re investing in.

Who is on the management team and what is their track record, for example? What types of products or services does the business offer and what is their target market? Which raw materials or talent sets do they require in order to succeed, and how do they go about sourcing these? How sustainable is the company and how does it treat its people and its local communities?

Ethical Investment plan

These are the same questions that should be asked when an investor is putting together an ethical investment plan. Investing ethically, in a nutshell, is all about understanding exactly what it is that your money is funding, then ensuring the funded businesses will not have a negative impact on society and on the environment.

 Differentiating between ethical and other investments

There is no absolute rule as to what is and is not an ethical investment. It very much depends on individual beliefs – which could be to do with religious belief, political leanings, environmental concerns or any one of many other variables – as well as the effects of location and time. A person living in a small town that is receiving much-needed mining income, for example, will have a different opinion to the city-dwelling environmentalist. During a time of war or civil unrest, people in certain territories around the globe will think differently about businesses involved in weapons manufacture. And while some feel uneasy about companies involved in alcohol marketing and production, others admire the quality of their brands and products and their promotion of responsible drinking.

In other words, ethical investment allows individuals to put their money behind businesses that match their own belief systems. It doesn’t necessarily mean the chosen organisations will outperform ones that are considered non-ethical. But it does mean greater satisfaction with, and likely more personal interest in, the set of businesses within the portfolio.

 Balancing investment performance with social responsibility

In order to balance social responsibility with investment returns, an investor must look into the business’s sustainability and HR record. They must get to know the products and services and find out what the business does to make these offerings a reality. In other words, they must develop a far more intimate understanding of the organisation than they would if they simply purchased shares thanks to a company’s growth record. Such a thorough investigation is a powerful exercise and one that is likely to pay dividends, in more ways than one, during the lifetime of the investment.

Speaking to fund managers

An investor may also choose to look into various funds that make it their business to buy shares only in ethical organisations, although you’ll want to check carefully to make sure your philosophies match up. Such funds may have investment policies that involve strict and pure approaches to ethical investing, while other may simply have loose guidelines that exclude certain types of organisations.

If the many positives of ethical investing are of interest, bring up the topic during your next meeting with your financial planner. They can help you to understand your current levels of ethically correct investment exposure and recommend strategies and choices for those that would like a greater comprehension of what exactly their money is supporting.


Investment Mix

Bonds, property, cash or shares? Choosing an investment mix

A little knowledge can go a long way when determining which investments are appropriate for your tolerance to risk, investment goals, timeframe and circumstances. It is therefore important to have some idea of how your ‘investment mix’ is created and where your money is going.

The most common asset classes represent different types of investment – cash, shares, fixed interest and property. Each asset class has a different level of risk and return, and therefore perform differently over time.

Risk and return
When you choose an asset class for your investment, it’s important to understand how it works, and to be clear about investment timeframes so you’re not setting yourself false expectations of how your money should be tracking over time.

When focussing on structuring your investment portfolio, remember investments that have provided higher returns over the longer term may produce a wider range of returns over the short term. This may mean these investments may not help you to meet your short term investment goals.

Let’s look at the different types of asset classes and the risk level involved.

1. Cash and fixed interest

In a nutshell: defensive assets, such as cash or fixed interest, are generally aimed at providing stable, more consistent returns.

  • Cash
    Cash refers to bank bills or other similar securities, which generally have a short term investment timeframe and provide more stable returns and a narrower range of returns over the shorter term than some other investments such as shares.

Risk level: Low risk

Minimum suggested timeframe: No minimum

  • Fixed interest
    These are securities such as government and corporate bonds and generally operate in a similar fashion to loans. You can get a regular interest payment from a bond for an agreed period of time and the value can go up and down, depending on changing interest rate levels. You get your initial outlay of cash back when the bond matures. Bonds have historically offered returns that are generally more consistent, but lower, than shares. They still contain some level of risk higher than a cash investment.

Risk level: Low–medium risk

Timeframe: Minimum suggested 3 years

  1. Property securities, Australian and international shares

In a nutshell: growth assets focused on capital growth and income.

  • Property
    Property can be bought directly or you can buy it indirectly via property securities. Property securities are usually listed on a stock exchange and traded in a similar way to shares. Depending on the specific security, each property security can represent an investment in a real property in various sectors including retail, industrial and office.

Risk level: Medium–high risk

Timeframe: Minimum suggested 5 years

  • Shares
    You can buy shares in companies locally and/or internationally. Your money buys you a stake in the company that can be traded on a stock exchange. This can be done directly, or through a managed fund, which will pool your money with other investors to buy shares in various companies.

The value of shares tends to fluctuate and shares are considered to be more risky than other asset classes. However, over the longer term, shares have historically tended to outperform other asset classes.

Risk level: High risk

Timeframe: Minimum suggested investment 7 years for both Australian and international shares.


Prospect theory

Prospect theory suggests that humans are non-rational decision-makers, and that losses carry a greater emotional impact than gains. It also explains a key reason for inertia in investment decision-making.

Prospect theory is an explanation of human decision-making under conditions where the outcome is uncertain. It can be applied to situations ranging from life decisions, such as whether to switch careers or relocate overseas, through to financial choices such as selecting an investment fund or deciding whether to purchase insurance.

Prospect theory was first defined 35 years ago by psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky1, who were subsequently awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for their research in the field of behavioural economics. Also known as ‘loss aversion theory’, prospect theory suggests that humans are non-rational decision-makers, and that losses carry a greater emotional impact than gains, even where there is no difference in the end result.

For example, most people experience the pain associated with losing $100 more intensely than the pleasure associated with winning $100. Research indicates that the emotional impact associated with a loss is around twice that associated with a gain, meaning that a $200 prize would be required to entice the average person to enter into a 50:50 wager of losing $100.

When it comes to investing, one way to avoid the common pitfalls associated with prospect theory is to invest in a professionally-managed investment fund. Experienced fund managers typically have a disciplined investment process and so are less susceptible to emotional decisions than investors who hold shares directly.

 

Evolutionary origins

Although prospect theory was defined relatively recently, psychologists believe that the risk aversion associated with the behaviour was developed as an evolutionary survival mechanism. Longevity was maximised by adopting a cautious approach, for example when deciding whether to challenge a neighbouring tribe or expand into unfamiliar territory.

 

Non-rational decision-making

In addition to highlighting the importance of risk-aversion, prospect theory introduces other concepts that help to explain decision-making:

Reference point is the state of affairs (usually the status quo) that possible outcomes are evaluated in relation to. Investors usually compare the respective gain and loss outcomes separately, rather than considering the final absolute result. This explains the widespread use of rebates and short-term bonus offers, as consumers tend to value these ‘extras’ more highly than identical benefits incorporated in the overall offering.

Decision weight refers to the human bias that distorts probability-based decision-making. For example, we tend to overweight the likelihood of small probabilities (hence the popularity of lotteries) and don’t place enough value on medium to high probability events.

 

Impact on investment decisions

The biased decision-making associated with prospect theory has a significant impact on investment decisions; yet most of us are unaware that our judgement is clouded.

Consider the following example. Jane must choose between two possible investment outcomes:

  1. a guaranteed gain of $250
  2. a 25% chance of gaining $1,000 and a 75% chance of gaining nothing

Jane opts for outcome 1 as she prefers the pleasure of a certain gain over the possibility of receiving nothing.

Market conditions alter, and three months later the two possible outcomes confronting Jane are as follows:

  1. a guaranteed loss of $250
  2. a 25% chance of losing $1,000 and a 75% chance of losing nothing

Faced with these alternatives, prospect theory suggests Jane is likely to choose option 2 as she prefers to risk the possibility of a large loss rather than experience the unpleasantness of crystallising a certain loss.

This example illustrates prospect theory’s link to the disposition effect, or the tendency to sell investments that have risen in value, and hold on to investments that have fallen in value. Successful investors are in fact more likely to do the opposite – hold on to appreciating investments while selling their loss‑makers.

Prospect theory also explains a key reason for inertia in investment decision-making. Investors considering a change in investment strategy or a restructure of their stock portfolio are likely to overweight the risks and potential losses associated with the change, and thus opt for the status quo even when the current situation is no longer optimal.

Awareness of prospect theory and its influence on decision making is the first step in avoiding an investment approach clouded by an emotional aversion to losses. However even armed with knowledge of risk-aversion prejudices, investors can struggle to override these ingrained behavioural biases.

A professional investment manager offers a range of products managed according to disciplined investment processes which can help eliminate bias associated with assessment of upside and downside risks.